🔗 Share this article

Following a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from seeing recorded content of the shooting incident involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an order issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Background on the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that allowed the regulator to instruct social media companies to geo-block the videos for users in Australia.

The platform X filed an appeal for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

Arguing its case, X asserted that the footage in question contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant argued the video was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated extensive public discourse". X even compared the footage and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

The majority of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. As a result, the panel revised the rating of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

A minority on the board disagreed, contending the post was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as the Kennedy video was made public years after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"X fought this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these principles."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to apply warning labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their own content policies.